Legal Opinion

Curtis G. Lockett v. Commissioner of IRS

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 5, 2009No. 08-12466UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Appellants Curtis and Edna Lockett, pro se, 1 appeal the Tax Court’s order determining tax deficiencies in the amounts of $3,049.00 for 2001, $32,675.00 for 2002, and $2,581.00 for 2003. On appeal, the Locketts procedurally contend that we should recuse ourselves and that we are without appellate jurisdiction. With respect to the substantive issues, the Locketts argue that the Tax Court improperly required them to substantiate then* deductions and incorrectly found that they had not substantiated the deductions claimed for tax years 2001, 2002, and 2003. 2

I

By statute, “[a]ny justice, judge,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Commissioner v. GroetzingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Larry Bolin, Kenneth David Pealock v. Richard W. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Frank J. Hradesky v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Commissioner v. Lincoln Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roumi v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  2. Iheke v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2013
  3. Sheridan v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2015
  4. Cahill v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2011
  5. Shleifer v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API