Legal Opinion

King v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1931Published

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

The liability of the defendant in this case is governed by the opinion in Earwood v. R. R., 192 N. C., 27, 133 S. E., 180. See, also, McGee v. Warren, 198 N. C., 672, 153 S. E., 162; Smith v. R. R., ante, 177; North Carolina Law Review, December, 1930, p. 98.

The defendant insists that it was the duty of the court to submit an issue of contributory negligence in each case. Of course, issues arise upon the pleadings and must be framed accordingly. Nevertheless, the trial judge is not required to submit an issue to the jury if there is no *400evidence to support it. Brown v. Kinsey, 81 N. C., 245;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. . KinseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. Earwood v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Rice v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Hoggard v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. McGee v. . WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API