Legal Opinion

Maeweather v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 2, 1992No. 91-925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appealing his conviction and sentence as a habitual violent felony offender, Kenneth Maeweather raises three points.

Appellant’s first point, based on error in allowing the witness Ramirez to testify, is affirmed without discussion.

*734Appellant’s second point urges that the circuit court’s use of the same prior felony conviction to convict him of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and to sentence him to an extended term as a habitual violent felony offender violates the constitutional prohibitions against double jeopardy. We reject this argument on the authority of Gayman v. State, 584…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pittman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Perkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Henderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Tillman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Ross v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Edler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Maeweather v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. Mason v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API