American Materials Technologies, LLC v. City of Chattanooga
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · FranksFranks, J.
in which GODDARD, P.J., and SUSANO, J., joined.
This is an appeal from the Chancellor’s refusal to allow movants to intervene in the case. Movants filed a motion to intervene after the parties had entered a consent judgment, and the Chancellor overruled the motion. On appeal, we affirm the Chancellor’s determination.
On August 24, 1998, plaintiff purchased property intending to conduct a quarry business. At the time the property was purchased, it was zoned M-l, a designation that would allow for the operation of a quarry. On September 22, 1998 and December 15, 1998, the Chattanooga City…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Scotty Grubbs, the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Proposed Intervenor/appellant v. Stephen H. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Triax Co. v. TRW, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Velsicol Chemical Corp. v. Enenco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Hamilton Nat. Bank v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
4Cited by13 opinions
- Bobby R. Posey, and wife, Sabrina Posey, and Dale Teague v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
- Carol Crisel v. Thomas CriselCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012
- Dialysis Clinic, Inc. v. Kevin MedleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019
- ESTATE OF MARTHA HARRISON BANE v. JOHN BANECourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2025
- Earlene Gregory v. Michael MelhornCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.