Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Iba v. Mosman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 17, 1910PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Certiorari. (1) The transactions shown in the record between the Missouri railroad companies and the Illinois company are tantamount to a consolidation, regardless of the name applied to such transaction, and by virtue of such consolidation the Chicagp, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company became a domestic corporation in respect to all of its acts in Missouri.

Read the full summary

Certiorari. (1) The transactions shown in the record between the Missouri railroad companies and the Illinois company are tantamount to a consolidation, regardless of the name applied to such transaction, and by virtue of such consolidation the Chicagp, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company became a domestic corporation in respect to all of its acts in Missouri. Railroad v. Ash-ling, 160 111. 373; Shadford v. Railroad, 89 N. W. 960-; Howell v. Lansing Co., 146 Mich. 450; Station v. Railroad, 144 N. C. 135; 1 Beach on Private Corporations, secs. 326, 327; Elliott on Railroads, secs. 26, 27, 28,…

1Opinion of the CourtValliant, J.

The record in this cause has come here in the return of a writ of certiorari issued out of this court to the circuit court of Buchanan county. The relator had filed in that court a suit against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company and Thomas O'’Phelan for damages for the death of her husband who she alleged in her petition was killed through the joint negligence of the two defendants. In her petition in that case the plaintiff stated that the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company was a corporation organized and incorporated under the laws of Ulinois, owning and operating…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Casey v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Padgett v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. State ex rel. Kansas & Texas Coal Railway v. SheltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Cummins v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Whiteaker v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  3. State Ex Rel. Schneider v. StewartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. State Ex Rel. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. NeafSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  5. Pueblo v. HennemanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1942

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API