Legal Opinion

State v. Barr

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 21, 2004No. 21792-2-IIIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKurtz, J.

Derrick D. Barr was convicted of second degree rape, unlawful imprisonment, and second degree vehicle prowl. On appeal, Mr. Barr contends the trial court erred by admitting a police officer’s testimony concerning the Reid Investigative Technique and by allowing the jury to view a videotape of Mr. Barr’s interrogation. Mr. Barr also asserts that the prosecuting attorney committed misconduct during her closing argument and when eliciting opinion testimony related to Mr. Barr’s credibility. Additionally, Mr. Barr contends he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. We conclude the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. LynnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. State v. DemeryWashington Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. State v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. State v. WeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. State v. WeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. State v. KirkmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API