Legal Opinion

United States v. Cigarette Merchandisers Ass'n

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 3, 1955PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUGARMAN, District Judge.

All defendants except one, pursuant to F.R.Crim.P. rule 11, 18 U.S.C.A., offer to withdraw their heretofore entered pleas of not guilty and to plea nolo contendere to the indictment herein, charging violation of the antitrust laws in the distribution, by coin vending machines, of cigarettes, in the metropolitan area of New York. The Attorney General opposes the granting by the court of its consent to the acceptance of the nolo contendere pleas, required by that rule.

At the outset, it is well to note that the committee which drafted the Federal Rules of Criminal…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Standard Ultramarine & Color Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  2. United States v. David E. Thompson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1956
  4. United States v. Cigarette Merchandisers Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  5. United States v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API