Legal Opinion

Swartz v. Kaplan

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 23, 1931No. 2478Published

1Opinion of the Court

MORTON, District Judge.

In deciding the motion to set aside the verdict I said: “That the case reeks with perjury I do not doubt; and I shall call it to the attention of the United States Attorney. The motion is overruled; but without prejudice to the defendants’ right to renew it at a later date if investigation shall establish that the verdict was clearly wrong.”

It was plainly doubtful whether the trial court had power to reserve any control over its judgment if and after that judgment should be affirmed by the Court of Appeals. To meet this objection the plaintiffs stipulated that the court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. In Re PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Exporters of Manufacturers' Products, Inc. v. Butterworth-Judson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Fairmont Creamery Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Southard v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1854

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API