Colvin v. Horseshoe Casino
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
I RASKINS, Judge.
The defendant, Horseshoe Casino, appeals a finding by a workers’ compensation judge that the plaintiff, Stella D. Colvin, is entitled to temporary total disability benefits and to supplemental earnings benefits. For the following reasons, we reverse.
FACTS
The plaintiff began working at Horseshoe as a beverage server on or about September 30, 1994. She earned $2.58 per hour, and tips. From July to August 1995, she took a leave of absence from her job, due to emotional problems not related to her employment. Although she did not report it on that date, the plaintiff claimed that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Alexander v. Pellerin Marble & GraniteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tippett v. Mid-State Wood PreserversLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000