Disciplinary Counsel v. Harp
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 385.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HARP. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Harp,
2001-Ohio-48.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Six-month suspension with entire six months stayed—Probation for six months with law practice monitored by a local attorney—Neglect of an entrusted legal matter—Intentionally failing to seek legal objectives of client—Failing to carry out contract for professional services—Prejudicing or damaging client during course of professional relationship. (No. 00-1891—Submitted December 13,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HarpOhio Supreme Court · 2001
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dayton Bar Assn. v. SebreeOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. NortonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Schnittke.Ohio Supreme Court · 2017