Legal Opinion

Simmons Pipe Bending Works v. Seymour

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 14, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

From a judgment in an action upon contract rendered by one of the District Courts of Newark, an appeal was taken to the Supreme Court, pursuant to the act. Pamph. L. 1902, p. 565. The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment upon grounds expressed in the following per curiam:

“The state of the ease fails to show that any legal question was presented to the trial court. There is no objection to evidence, no request to find, and no exception to the actual finding. There is, therefore, no determination of the District Court in point of law or upon the admission or rejection of evidence for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. O'Donnell v. WeilerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pratt v. Union National BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API