Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Kathryn Manning v. Peter J. Bellafiore, M.D.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 24, 2016No. 13-14, 13-16Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Robinson

I am pleased to be able to concur in the Court’s opinion to the extent that it vacates the very substantial monetary sanction which the trial court imposed on White & Kelly, P.C.1 However, I respectfully but most vigorously dissent from the Court’s ruling that any monetary sanction (regardless of the amount) was appropriately levied against Doctor Peter J. Bellaf-iore. It is my very definite view that neither Dr. Bellafíore nor his attorneys engaged in any sanctionable conduct in this case.

I am well aware of the stresses and strains that are inherent in all litigation, and I am equally aware…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Spallone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. United States v. Richard A. HornCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. Fellheimer, Eichen & Braverman, P.C. v. Charter Technologies, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API