Nippy, Inc. v. Pro Rok, Inc.

OPINION AND ORDER

LAFFITTE, District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Nippy, Inc.’s motion to voluntarily dismiss this action with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule 41(a)(2). In their reply to Plaintiffs motion, Defendants request that the dismissal be conditioned upon Plaintiffs payment of Defendant’s legal fees. Defendants also seek “an amount not less than $45,000” in sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule 11. Plaintiff had brought this action alleging damages pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ' Act (“RICO”) 1 and Puerto Rico law claims. The bench trial in this…