Miller v. Borton

(after stating the facts as above).

There is but one question presented by this appeal. Was appellant’s conduct such as to justify the court in postponing his participation in the assets of the bankrupt estate until all other creditors were paid?

On oral argument the contention was made that the proof failed to show the exact amount of appellant’s claim and that it included usurious and other illegal charges. The record does not support the argument.

*794In its objections to appellant’s claim, the objector stated:

“That at the time the bankrupt commenced their business they became indebted to one A.…