Legal Opinion

In Re Diomed Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 15, 2008No. 12-43075PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON APPLICATION OF ENDOLASER ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. FOR ALLOWANCE AND PAYMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE CLAIM PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. §§ 503(a), 503(b) AND 507(a)(2)

JOEL B. ROSENTHAL, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter came before the Court for hearing on the Application of Endolaser Associates, L.L.C. for Allowance of Administrative Expense Claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 503(a), 503(b) and 507(a)(2) [docket # 328] and the objections of the Debtors [docket # 356] and Creditors’ Committee [docket # 357]. Endolaser asserts an administrative claim of approximately $2.33 million while…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Albany Partners, Ltd. v. Westbrook (In Re Albany Partners, Ltd.)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re BlairUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
  2. In re Hopkinton Independent School, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013
  3. In re Davenport Beverage Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API