North Bank v. Wood
Supreme Court of Vermont
Assumpsit. The defendants pleaded, separately, the general issue. The trial in the county court was joint, and the plaintiffs were nonsuited, with leave to move to set aside the nonsuit. The county court refused the motion, and the case came up upon exceptions. The plaintiffs not appearing here, this court adjudged that they take nothing by their motion. The defendants claimed separate costs.
1Opinion of the Court
By the court.
It has been long settled that, in actions ex contractu, the defendants are entitled to tax only one travel, term and attorney fee. In actions ex delicto, the defendants may always tax separate travel, and, if they plead separately, they may tax separate term fees. But it has not been usual in such cases to allowjseparate attorney fees, unless the trials or, at least, the judgments are separate. The statute of 1835 extends the rules of courts of chancery, in relation to the joinder of parties, to actions, at law, upon contract. But this court see no good reason to allow separate…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Prescott v. BartlettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1861