Legal Opinion

Board of Trustees v. Mitchell

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 14, 2002No. 02292, Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAUSER, Judge.

The principal issue before us is whether cancer, resulting from occupational hazards, can constitute an “injury” under Article 22, §§ 29-45 of the Baltimore City Code, 1976 Edition (“Retirement Act”). Our resolution of that issue is the first step in determining whether appellee, Deborah Mitchell, personal representative of the Estate of James C. Mitchell, Jr., 1 is entitled to receive special disability pension benefits under the Retirement Act. The second and final step—the determination of whether appellee’s claim is barred by the statute of limitations—must await further…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Poffenberger v. RisserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's CounselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Board of Physician Quality Assurance v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Hecht v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pooshs v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Fire & Police Employees' Retirement System v. MiddletonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Hersl v. Fire & Police Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Employees' Retirement System v. DorseyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Fedorowicz v. State Retirement & Pension SystemCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API