Legal Opinion
Robert A. Sorensen v. Michael Mahoney
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 19, 1996No. 95-35576Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
87 F.3d 1322
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Robert A. SORENSEN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Michael MAHONEY, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 95-35576.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 11, 1996.*
Decided June 19, 1996.
Before: CANBY, NOONAN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORANDUM**
2
Robert A. Sorensen, a Montana state prisoner, appeals pro se the district…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Talal B. Jammal v. John K. Van De Kamp, Attorney General of the State of California Superior Court of the County of Contra CostaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.