Legal Opinion

Addiss v. Selig

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

The plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of themselves and all other creditors of Arthur L. Selig, deceased, under the provisions of section 52 of the Domestic Relations Law, to reach that portion of the insurance on the life of Selig received by his widow as beneficiary, which was purchased by premiums in excess of $500 a year paid by the insured with his own funds.

On November 6, 1924, Selig made and delivered to Morton H. Meinhard twenty-five promissory notes, each in the sum of $1,000, each bearing the date of delivery and payable annually thereafter *732over a period of twenty-five years.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Bronson v. KinzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  3. Everett v. JudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Burlingham v. CrouseSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Cohen v. SamuelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adelman v. AdelmanNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Schwartz v. HolzmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  3. Addiss v. SeligAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  4. In re the Estate of FlynnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1983
  5. Cecilian Operating Corp. v. BerkwitNew York Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API