Daywitt v. Harpestead

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA KENNETH DAYWITT, et al., Case No. 20-CV-1743 (NEB/ECW) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER ON REPORT & RECOMMENDATION JODI HARPSTEAD,1 et al., Defendants. Pro se Plaintiffs, civilly committed clients of the Minnesota Sex Offender Program, brought this lawsuit alleging that MSOP’s restrictions on clients’ internet use violate Plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights. Plaintiffs retained an expert to support their claims. Defendants move to exclude Plaintiffs’ expert, and both parties move for summary judgment. In a Report and Recommendation, United States…