Harold O. Fulp, Jr. v. Nancy A. Gilliland
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RUSH, Justice.
Revocable trusts are popular substitutes for wills, intended to provide non-probate distribution of people's estates after their deaths, allowing them to retain control and use of their assets during their lifetimes. Here, Ruth Fulp placed her family farm in a revocable trust, reserving the right to revoke or amend the trust and to use its assets-with any remaining trust assets going to her three children upon her death. A few years later, she decided to sell the farm to her son Harold Jr. for a low price, to pay for her retirement-home care and keep the farm in the family.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- University of Southern Indiana Foundation v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Hauck v. Second National Bank of RichmondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Marion County Auditor v. Sawmill Creek, LLCIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. WillitsIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Brundage v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brenda Sue Gittings and Marc Richmond Gittings v. William H. DealIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
- Holmes v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
- Aspen American Insurance Company v. Blackbaud, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022
- Bank of America, N.A. v. CartwrightDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
- Cheryl Barron Doll v. Steven E. Post, Trustee, and Indiana Attorney GeneralIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.