Legal Opinion

Harold O. Fulp, Jr. v. Nancy A. Gilliland

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 2013No. 41S01-1306-TR-426PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSH, Justice.

Revocable trusts are popular substitutes for wills, intended to provide non-probate distribution of people's estates after their deaths, allowing them to retain control and use of their assets during their lifetimes. Here, Ruth Fulp placed her family farm in a revocable trust, reserving the right to revoke or amend the trust and to use its assets-with any remaining trust assets going to her three children upon her death. A few years later, she decided to sell the farm to her son Harold Jr. for a low price, to pay for her retirement-home care and keep the farm in the family.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. University of Southern Indiana Foundation v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Hauck v. Second National Bank of RichmondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Marion County Auditor v. Sawmill Creek, LLCIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. WillitsIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Brundage v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brenda Sue Gittings and Marc Richmond Gittings v. William H. DealIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Holmes v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  3. Aspen American Insurance Company v. Blackbaud, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022
  4. Bank of America, N.A. v. CartwrightDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
  5. Cheryl Barron Doll v. Steven E. Post, Trustee, and Indiana Attorney GeneralIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API