Legal Opinion

Quintard v. Corcoran

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 15, 1882PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Civil action on a bond given by tbe defendants to the plaintiff as treasurer of the town of Norwalk, for the observance of all laws relating to intoxicating liquors by the defendant Corcoran, who had been licensed by the county commissioners to sell liquors in said town; brought to the Superior Court, and tried to the jury before Hitchcock, J. Verdict for the plaintiff, and motions in error and for a new trial by the defendants. The ease is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtPark, C. J.

This is a suit on a bond of one thousand dollars given to the treasurer of the county of Fairfield, to *35which was attached the following condition:—“ The condition of this obligation is such, that whereas the above bounden Patrick Corcoran has this day been licensed by the board of county commissioners of the county of Fair-field to sell intoxicating liquors in the town of Norwalk in said county—now if the said Patrick Corcoran shall duly observe all laws relating to intoxicating liquors during the time covered by said license, and also shall pay all damages arising from sales of intoxicating…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. WolfarthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WipkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. State v. CalantiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1946
  4. State v. VienupSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  5. State ex rel. Summers v. Lake Tavern, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API