Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Pearl

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1931No. 23029. En BancPublished

1ConcurrenceMain, J.

(concurring in the result) — In this case I concur in the result arrived at in the majority opinion, and will briefly state my views.

It is a general rule that a litigant may not recover an attorney’s fee from the opposite party in the absence of a statute granting that right, and our attention has not been called to any statute which gives that right in cases of the present kind; but, in my opinion, these appeals will have to be dismissed for the reason that the amount involved in each is insufficient to give this court jurisdiction under the provisions of the constitution. The same result…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Simpson v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API