Legal Opinion

Velia v. Reading Company

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 1936No. Appeal, 357PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The sole question involved in this workmen’s compensation case is whether claimant’s decedent was engaged in interstate transportation at the time he was killed. The referee found that he was not and awarded the widow compensation. The board affirmed the referee, but, on appeal to the court of common pleas, judgment was entered for the defendant. We are all of the opinion that the court below correctly held that the deceased' was at the time engaged in interstate transportation.

Both referee and board found as facts that Angelo Velia was employed on March 1,1935 and for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Erie Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Erie Railroad v. WelshSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mease v. Reading Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Mason v. Reading CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Jordan v. Erie Railroad Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Miller v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Niblett v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API