Hull v. Roseman
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court
1Opinion of the CourtBaynes, J.
This is an action by the Trustee seeking direction of the Court as to distribution of a $50,000 fund and expenses to be taxed to determine the net amount of proceeds to those so entitled.
Certain counsel including the plaintiff in this case represented many, but not all, of Grace L. Roseman’s heirs at law and all of Charles E. Roseman’s heirs at law. Grace was the surviving spouse of Charles. The parties, whom counsel represented, brought an action and were joined by certain defendants as opponents or contestants of the Will of Grace, which had been admitted to Probate. A trial court jury…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lyeth v. HoeySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ellis v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Bailey v. . McLainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Holmes, Trustee v. HrobonOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
3Cited by2 opinions
- Petty v. CallTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Estate of WhitmoreOhio Court of Appeals · 1983