Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Loderman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 27, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term. In the matter of the proceedings supplementary to execution of Henry W. Mitchell against Gerson Goderman and another. From an order reducing a fine imposed on a judgment debtor, the judgment creditor appeals.

1Per curiam

The order appealed from was irregular and unauthorized. If the judgment debtor was guilty of contempt, and the proceedings to punish him were regularly conducted, he should have suffered more than a nominal fine. If the justice upon re-examination of the case found that there was no contempt, or that the proceedings to punish him were irregular, he should have vacated his order in toto. As it now stands, the debtor is convicted of contempt, the proceedings to punish him are sustained as to their regularity, and yet,he is fined a sum which bears no relation to the injury done to the judgment…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bird v. WesselsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API