Legal Opinion

Ruston v. Grimwood

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1868PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Vanderburgh Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

Suit by the appellee against the appellants for trespass for entering the enclosed land of the plaintiff and removing fences.

The defendant answered in two paragraphs. The second paragraph is the general denial. The first paragraph justified the entry and removing the fences under an order of the Board of Commissioners of Vanderburgh county, made at their December term, 1866, locating and establishing a township road.

A demurrer was sustained to this paragraph, and that is complained of as the first alleged error.

This paragraph is bad, because it fails to aver that the supervisor gave the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thayer v. BurgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. McDonald v. PayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Todd v. CrailIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Rutherford v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Suits v. MurdockIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API