Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Integrated Beverage Group Ltd. v. New York State Liquor Authority
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 13, 2004Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Nicholas Figueroa, J.
Petitioner seeks, pursuant to CPLR article 78, to reverse and annul respondent’s August 13, 2004 final determination denying its application to register its brand for three malt beverage *639products: Freaky Ice Passion Cocktail, Freaky Ice Cherry Fusion and Freaky Ice Lemon Stinger. Respondent’s final determination affirmed the initial denial by its Division of Wholesale Services, dated June 24, 2004.
Petitioner’s products have an alcohol content of 4.8% (9.6 proof). Petitioner’s package label instruction advises the consumer to “Serve Frozen.” The label…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Purdy v. KreisbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Salvati v. EimickeNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Nelson v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Cumberland Farms Food Stores of New York, Inc. v. State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Affiliated Distillers Brands Corp. v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.