Long v. Durnil
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
S. Anthony Long, Dean Boerste, Randall K. Bailey, Jeffrey T. Gore and Larry Barr (collectively “Long”) appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Mark Durnil, the Indiana State Police and the State of Indiana (collectively “Durnil”) in Long’s defamation and civil rights action against Durnil.
We affirm in part and reverse in part.
ISSUES
I. Whether the trial court erred in granting Dumil’s summary judgment motion on the defamation count.
II. Whether the trial court erred in granting Durml’s summary judgment motion on the 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Buckey v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Lake County Juvenile Court v. SwansonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- McQueen v. Fayette County School Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Spudich v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. DabagiaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Samm v. Great Dane TrailersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Glasscock v. CorlissIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.