Legal Opinion

Kotlowitz v. Vogue Service Co.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided February 17, 1971PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBentuey Kassal, J.

Over the years, a devious pattern of delayed settlement payments has developed involving unsuspecting plaintiffs who have agreed to settle personal injury claims with so-called ‘ ‘ self-insured ’ ’ taxicab companies. Having recently become aware of this, I have since learned that this is a common and prevalent practice among these carriers and has existed for some time. However, in my opinion, this practice should be stopped, and I am, therefore, giving notice to the Bar of this court’s views on settlement practice and due diligence in making payment.

The facts in the present case illustrate…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Douglas F. Warner v. Donat Rossignol v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
  2. Andres Hall v. People to People Health Foundation, Inc., and Grace Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. Tirado v. Gong Cab Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1971
  4. Becker v. City of New YorkCivil Court of the City of New York · 1974
  5. Robinson v. Hall Cab Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API