Legal Opinion

Adams v. Medtronic, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided March 30, 2022No. 4:19-cv-00870Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION JANET ADAMS, ET AL. § § v. § CIVIL NO. 4:19-CV-870-SDJ § MEDTRONIC, INC., ET AL. § MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On March 3, 2022, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation (“Report”). (Dkt. #66). In the Report, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Defendants Medtronic,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. Robinson Property Group, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. Christopher v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. (In Re Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Pinnacle Hip Implant Prod. Liab. Litig.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. Brockert v. WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  4. Genie Industries, Inc. v. Ricky Matak, Belinda Matak and Misty Sonnier, as Representative of the Estate of Walter Pete Logan MatakTexas Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API