Legal Opinion

Medford Red Cab, Inc. v. Duncan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 3, 1961PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

This is a petition to vacate a judgment entered by default in the Superior Court in an action of tort in which the respondents (husband and wife) were plaintiffs and the petitioner was defendant. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 250, § 15. The petition was denied, and the case is here on the petitioner’s exceptions.

The petition makes these allegations. The writ was dated August 1, 1958, and was returnable in the First Dis trict Court of Eastern Middlesex on August 30, 1958, and was removed by the plaintiffs (the respondents)' to the Superior Court. The petitioner was served with a summons, which was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Russell v. FoleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Duff v. WebsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Herlihy v. KaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Margolis v. MargolisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lubell v. First National Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  2. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  3. Ancora-Citronelle Corp. v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Naughton v. First National Bank of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  5. Mede v. ColbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API