Legal Opinion

Ensign v. Colt

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 18, 1902PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action for breach of covenant of warranty, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County and tried to the court, Case, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the defendant, and appeal by the plaintiffs for alleged errors in the rulings of the court. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

This is an action for damages for an alleged breach of the covenant of warranty contained in a deed from the defendant to the plaintiffs.

The complaint states that the defendant has failed to defend to the plaintiffs the stone wall included in the “second piece ” described in said deed, and that the plaintiffs have been evicted from a part of the premises by the operation of a judgment permanently enjoining the plaintiffs from removing the stones from said wall.

In the appeal to this court the plaintiffs claim that the trial court erred in holding that the facts found failed to establish a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. NortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1835
  2. Mackey v. HarmonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Hendricks v. . StarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. Giles v. DugroThe Superior Court of New York City · 1852
  5. King v. KilbrideSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wildwood Associates, Ltd. v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Perkins v. AugustSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  3. Patzloff v. KasperovichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Zandri v. TendlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. Bubser v. RanguetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API