Legal Opinion

Burnell v. Olmsted

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1909No. 6054Published

Appeal from Arapahoe District Court — Hon. A. H. De France, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

This was an action by plaintiff below, Frank A. Burnell, appellant here, against the defendants below, Maggie Olmsted and Maud Olmsted, appellees *68here, to set aside and cancel a deed of conveyance of certain real property situate in the town of Littleton, Colorado, from the said Maggie Olmsted to the said Maud, mother and daughter respectively, as being fraudulent and void as to said plaintiff, a judgment creditor of the said Maggie. It is charged, as grounds for the relief prayed, that the conveyance was voluntary and without consideration, made with the intent and purpose of placing said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hapgood v. FisherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1852
  2. Bent v. BentNew York Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API