Legal Opinion
In Re Schmiedel
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided July 9, 1999No. 18-31894PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON DEBTOR’S MOTION FOR CONTEMPT AND SANCTIONS AGAINST DAVID AND NANCY JOLLIFF
M. DEE McGARITY, Bankruptcy Judge.
On March 22, 1994, the debtor, Michelle Schmiedel, filed for bankruptcy protection under chapter 7 and received a discharge on June 29, 1994. The debtor filed this motion for contempt and sanctions against David and Nancy Jolliff after the Jolliffs refused to release a judgment lien on her property. The lien arose by judgment entered against her former spouse after the debtor’s bankruptcy was closed and while the Sehmiedels were still married.
FACTS
The material…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Farrey v. SanderfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re KarberUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1982
- Law Offices of Moore & Moore v. Stoneking (In Re Stoneking)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- In Re PageUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1994
- In Re StricklandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rooz v. Kimmel (In Re Kimmel)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- In Re MooreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2004
- In Re NelsonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
- Rooz v. Kimmel (In Re Kimmel)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Kelley v. Dahle-Fenske (In re Dahle-Fenske)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.