Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Collins

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 27, 1942No. 14,973PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

These parties appear in the same order as in the trial court and are hereinafter referred to as there, or for convenience plaintiffs in error are referred to as Harry and Dan, and defendants in error as Collins, Harriet, Josie, Ida, Catherine, Frank, Jack and Nettie, respectively, and Raymond McLaughlin, deceased, as McLaughlin.

This action involves the construction of the will of McLaughlin in the light of facts arising since his death. He had bequeathed all of his estate, either absolute or for life, to Harriet. Most of it remained in her hands at her death and was disposed of by her will.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blatt v. BlattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  2. Bacon v. KiteleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  3. Gregg v. BaileySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  4. Methodist Church v. FairbanksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pitman v. Colorado National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  2. Colorado Springs National Bank v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1966
  3. First National Bank of Denver v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  4. Davey v. WeberSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  5. Estate of Zell v. ZellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API