Legal Opinion

McGinsey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1912No. 1564PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was indicted, charged with robbery, and when tried he was convicted and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for fifty years.

In the motion for new trial fit is alleged that the court erred in admitting the testimony of Cullen Nobles, an accomplice in the offense charged. There was no bill of exceptions reserved to admitting the testimony of this witness in evidence, therefore the question is not presented in a way we could review it. However, if it is intended to object to the testimony as a whole on the sole ground that he is an accomplice, this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Maples v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Butts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Barber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  4. Scruggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  5. Underwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McKee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Olliff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Coker, Travis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2002
  4. Olliff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API