Covington v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Presiding Judge.
The use of the present tense in an affidavit to support a search warrant ("affiant has received information from a reliable informant that subject is selling drugs at the house located” etc.), in the light of other recited circumstances, is sufficient to show that the facts recited are current and not stale. Johnston v. State, 227 Ga. 387, 390 (181 SE2d 42); Fowler v. State, 121 Ga. App. 22, 23 (172 SE2d 447); Lewis v. State, 126 Ga. App. 123 (2b) (190 SE2d 123); Butler v. State, 127 Ga. App. 539 (1) (194 SE2d 261). It appears here that a surveillance had been on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. AndertonUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Reece v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Cochran v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Danford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.