Williams v. Christian
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SOMERVILLE, Judge.
The refusal of a lookout instruction has generated a head on confrontation between the parties in a tort action. The appellant, plaintiff below, tendered the following lookout instruction as his verdict director, which was refused by the trial court:
“REFUSED INSTRUCTION NO. A
Your verdict must be for plaintiff if you believe:
First, defendant failed to keep a careful lookout, and
Second, defendant was thereby negligent, and
Third, as a direct result of such negligence the plaintiff sustained damage.
The term ‘negligence’ as used in this instruction means the failure to use the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Williams Ex Rel. Williams v. RicklemannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Ukman v. Hoover Motor Express Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Miller v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Bollman Ex Rel. Sanderson v. Kark Rendering PlantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Zipp v. Gasen's Drug Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Powers v. EllfeldtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Bunch v. McMillianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Morgan v. ToomeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Murphy v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Fowler v. S-H-S Motor Sales Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.