Legal Opinion

Williams v. Christian

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1974No. KCD 26218PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOMERVILLE, Judge.

The refusal of a lookout instruction has generated a head on confrontation between the parties in a tort action. The appellant, plaintiff below, tendered the following lookout instruction as his verdict director, which was refused by the trial court:

“REFUSED INSTRUCTION NO. A

Your verdict must be for plaintiff if you believe:

First, defendant failed to keep a careful lookout, and

Second, defendant was thereby negligent, and

Third, as a direct result of such negligence the plaintiff sustained damage.

The term ‘negligence’ as used in this instruction means the failure to use the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Williams Ex Rel. Williams v. RicklemannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Ukman v. Hoover Motor Express Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Miller v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. Bollman Ex Rel. Sanderson v. Kark Rendering PlantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Zipp v. Gasen's Drug Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Powers v. EllfeldtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Bunch v. McMillianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Morgan v. ToomeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Murphy v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Fowler v. S-H-S Motor Sales Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API