Legal Opinion

Standridge v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 21, 1992No. CR 92-407PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of manufacturing a controlled substance. The court of appeals in a three-to-three decision affirmed the conviction. Standridge v. State, 37 Ark. App. 153, 826 S.W.2d 303 (March 18, 1992). We granted appellant’s petition for a writ of certiorari because of the tie vote and because the case merited review. See Perkins v. Perkins, 267 Ark. 112, 589 S.W.2d 29 (1979). We reverse the decision of the court of appeals and direct it to reverse the judgment of conviction of the circuit court, and, because of the insufficiency of the evidence, dismiss…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Abdullah v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Pemberton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Hurvey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sheridan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Eggers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  3. Trimble v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Ashe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Medlock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API