Legal Opinion

Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. Lee

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1929Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcBBIDE, J.

In the outset there was a stipulation between the parties, which reads as follows:

“It is hereby stipulated and agreed that the above entitled two cases may be consolidated and heard together, and if the laws of the state of Oregon permit a foreign mutual accident health insurance company, organized under the laws of another state, having no capital stock, to qualify and receive a license from the insurance commissioner of this state authorizing such company to transact its business therein, then that plaintiff association shall be entitled to receive such license as prayed for in its…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Union Pac. Life Ins. v. FergusonOregon Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API