Hood v. Hood
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
YATES, Judge.
The parties were divorced in April 1983; the husband was ordered to pay periodic alimony and child support. In November 1991, the wife petitioned for a rule nisi, alleging that the husband had failed to comply with the divorce judgment, and asked for a modification to increase the award of periodic alimony. The husband answered and cross-petitioned, seeking to modify the divorce judgment “so as to eliminate ... any requirement ... that [he] pay or provide for post-graduate expenses or any other expenses” of the parties’ child. The husband later amended his cross-petition, to ask…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tucker v. TuckerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Hicks v. HicksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Wiggins v. WigginsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991