Legal Opinion

Hood v. Hood

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 15, 1994No. AV93000182Published

1Opinion of the Court

YATES, Judge.

The parties were divorced in April 1983; the husband was ordered to pay periodic alimony and child support. In November 1991, the wife petitioned for a rule nisi, alleging that the husband had failed to comply with the divorce judgment, and asked for a modification to increase the award of periodic alimony. The husband answered and cross-petitioned, seeking to modify the divorce judgment “so as to eliminate ... any requirement ... that [he] pay or provide for post-graduate expenses or any other expenses” of the parties’ child. The husband later amended his cross-petition, to ask…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tucker v. TuckerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Hicks v. HicksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  3. Wiggins v. WigginsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API