Legal Opinion
Richard Nathan Corp. v. Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 10, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULBERT, District Judge.
The defendants have filed companion motions to vacate attachments allowed herein, or in the alternative, to reduce the amounts attached, and also to increase the amount of the plaintiff’s security. Both defendants pray further in the alternative that the attachments be vacated upon the filing of a joint and several bond.
Defendant Mitsui has also moved for leave to file an amended answer herein.
The first and second causes of action are directed against defendant Mitsubishi. The first sets forth a claim for breach of contract; the second, in the alternative, is based…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wulfsohn v. Russian Socialist Federated Soviet RepublicNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Ladenburg v. Commercial Bank of NewfoundlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Goldmark v. Magnolia Metal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Downey v. PalmerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Romeo v. GarofaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Fletcher v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963