Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Scenic Coach Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 9, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

As appears from the foregoing statement, this case came here at the Fall Term, 1939, upon an appeal from an order dismissing the plaintiff’s appeal to the Superior Court, upon the contention by the Utilities Commission and the Atlantic Greyhound Corporation that no appeal lay from the order of the Utilities Commissioner. The court was of the contrary opinion, holding that such an appeal was proper under the express wording of the statute, cited by appellant in the case at bar — C. S., 1097; Michie’s 1935 Coder “From all decisions or determinations made by the Utilities Commission, any party…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Rhyne v. . LipscombeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Armfield v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1852
  5. Coltrane v. . LaughlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gore v. JohnWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Svilar Light & Power v. RIVERTON VALLEY ELEC. ASS'NWyoming Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Ocean Hill Joint Venture v. CurrituckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. State ex rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API