Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1947No. V-371Published

1Opinion of the Court

- R-698 389 OF’FICE OF _ THE ATTORNEY GE~RAL AUSTIN. TEXAS PRICEDANIEL *IMRYiEY GqieRAL September 8, 1947 Hon. C. H. Cavness Opinion No. V-371 State Auditor Capitol Station Re:. The legality,of a state Austin, Texas employee's~reoeiving and uslngthe jury fee.ror serving as a. juror while, on state payroll. Dear Sir: Your request for an opinion upon the above sub- . ject matter is as .rouows: ., "1 shall great-ly'appreciate your opinion as to whether it is .legal; un- aer our Constitution ana Statutes; r0r a S'tate employee to receive, and use the proceeds of, rees for'serv$ng as a juror in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fredericks v. Board of HealthSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  2. People ex rel. Madden v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  4. People v. HoptUtah Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Reading v. MaxwellArizona Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API