Black v. Mark
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 102, Jan. T., 1922, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., June T., 1920, No. 3663, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of James B. Black v. Adolph Mark. Trespass for personal injuries. Before Stern, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $2,500. Defendant appealed. Error assigned, inter alia, was refusal of defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v., quoting record.
1Opinion of the Court
Phe Curiam,
Plaintiff’s action is to recover damages for injuries received, at the intersection of Montgomery Avenue and Broad Street, Philadelphia, in a collision .between an auto truck owned by him and upon which he was riding and an automobile driven by defendant. The accident happened at seven o’clock in the evening of November 25,1919. It was raining at the time, the streets were to some extent covered with sleet and the night “somewhat foggy.” Plaintiff’s truck was traveling west on Montgomery Avenue and defendant’s auto north on Broad Street. The testimony as to the circumstances of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Weber v. GreenebaumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Simon v. Lit Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bailey v. C. Lewis Lavine, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Davis v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Dansky v. KotimakiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1925
- Schlossstein Et Ux. v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Swift v. CorradoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.