Legal Opinion
United States v. Lambert
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 1, 2004No. 04-40102-01-SACPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, Senior District Judge.
The case comes before the court on the defendant’s following pretrial motions: Motion to Suppress Evidence and Statements (Dk.19), Motion for Discovery Related to Drug Detection Dog (Dk.20), and Motion to Suppress Statement (Dk.21). The government has filed a consolidated response (Dk.22) opposing these pretrial motions. On November 16, 2004, the parties presented their evidence and arguments. The defendant emphasized his request for court-ordered discovery concerning the drug detection canine and for additional time to file any related motions.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. ParkerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2015
- United States v. MoralesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2007