Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fox v. Clifton Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 5, 1922No. 11060Published

1DissentJustice Fraser

(dissenting) ; The appellant’s argument thus states this case:. “This is an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant for. damages for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by the plaintiff while a girl of seven years of age in the employ of the defendant company. Judge Sease passed an order on the motion of attorneys for defendant .requiring the plaintiff to appear before.him at a time and place specified to be examined in accordance with the provisions of Section 430 et seq., of Volume 2 qf.the Code. Upon motion of the attorneys for the plaintiff, however, the said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. Spartanburg Ry., Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API