Legal Opinion

O'DELL v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1978No. 3191PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and RABI-NOWITZ, CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ. CONNOR, Justice.

In this appeal, O’Dell seeks reversal of his conviction for malicious destruction of property, contending that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. 1 In addition, he claims that his right to a trial within 120 days under Rule 45, Alaska R. Crim.P., was violated.

The facts, viewed most favorably to the prosecution, 2 are as follows: On March 20, 1976, at approximately 6:00 p.m., Rick Kinsey was driving a reddish-brown Gremlin down 15th Avenue in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. DeSacia v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Beck v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Noble v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cooper v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Andrew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  3. State v. JeskeCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
  4. State v. AngaiakCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1993
  5. Davidson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API