Legal Opinion

Valley Housing & Development Corp. v. Ridges Metropolitan District

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1988No. 85CA1736PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TURSI, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Valley Housing & Development Corporation and Ridges Development *802Corporation, (Ridges) appeal a declaratory judgment entered in favor of Ridges Metropolitan District (District) determining that availability of service or facility charges (standby fees) charged to it by the District for undeveloped lots were in compliance with the applicable statutes. We affirm.

The District, a metropolitan district organized and authorized pursuant to § 32-1-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1987 Cum. Supp.), issued general obligation bonds to pay for facilities constructed for the distribution of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ames v. People ex rel. TempleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  2. Rancho Colorado, Inc. v. City of BroomfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  3. Senior Corp. v. Board of Assessment AppealsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  4. Wasson v. HogensonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. East Arapahoe Land Co. v. Board of Assessment AppealsColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Crested Butte South Metropolitan District v. DykeColorado Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API